<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1, latin1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for aporem.net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aporem.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aporem.net</link>
	<description>the web of questions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:07:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Watching a project slip by aporem.net &#187; KDE 4 by Xmas</title>
		<link>http://www.aporem.net/it/watching-a-project-slip/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>aporem.net &#187; KDE 4 by Xmas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aporem.net/it/watching-a-project-slip/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>[...] still very skeptical that KDE 4 will be released as scheduled. But apparently the developers have not curbed their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] still very skeptical that KDE 4 will be released as scheduled. But apparently the developers have not curbed their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Without programming principles by aporem.net &#187; Blessed are the toolmakers v3</title>
		<link>http://www.aporem.net/programming/without-programming-principles/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>aporem.net &#187; Blessed are the toolmakers v3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 09:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aporem.net/programming/without-programming-principles/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>[...] fully agree. And hence, I should turn my little script from my past article into a tool. But isn&#8217;t it already one? &#8212; Both authors fail to give a definition of what [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] fully agree. And hence, I should turn my little script from my past article into a tool. But isn&#8217;t it already one? &#8212; Both authors fail to give a definition of what [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FreeBSD 6.2-Beta3 by aporem.net &#187; FreeBSD 6.2-RC1</title>
		<link>http://www.aporem.net/freebsd/freebsd-62-beta3/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>aporem.net &#187; FreeBSD 6.2-RC1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 07:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aporem.net/misc/freebsd-62-beta3/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>[...] announced the availability of the first release candidate (RC) for FreeBSD 6.2. I&#8217;ve already posted about the delays and problems this release faces, but now the worst issues has been fixed and the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] announced the availability of the first release candidate (RC) for FreeBSD 6.2. I&#8217;ve already posted about the delays and problems this release faces, but now the worst issues has been fixed and the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Official start of FreeBSD 6.2 release cycle by aporem.net &#187; FreeBSD 6.2-Beta3</title>
		<link>http://www.aporem.net/freebsd/official-start-of-freebsd-62-release-cycle/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>aporem.net &#187; FreeBSD 6.2-Beta3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aporem.net/?p=40#comment-8</guid>
		<description>[...] my post official start of the FreeBSD 6.2 release cycle, I&#8217;ve reproduced a timetable alongside with the promise to post more informations on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my post official start of the FreeBSD 6.2 release cycle, I&#8217;ve reproduced a timetable alongside with the promise to post more informations on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Developing against third party software by aporem.net &#187; Licensing vows</title>
		<link>http://www.aporem.net/programming/developing-against-third-party-software/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>aporem.net &#187; Licensing vows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aporem.net/programming/developing-against-third-party-software/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>[...] This post is the second in the series developing against third party software. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post is the second in the series developing against third party software. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A new category: programming by aporem.net &#187; New schedule</title>
		<link>http://www.aporem.net/editorials/a-new-category-programming/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>aporem.net &#187; New schedule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 09:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aporem.net/?p=14#comment-6</guid>
		<description>[...] Even though this has no direct impact to my site (at least I hope so), since I do no direct coverage, I felt that I&#8217;m obliged to mention changes to the point 6 of the bloging principles. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Even though this has no direct impact to my site (at least I hope so), since I do no direct coverage, I felt that I&#8217;m obliged to mention changes to the point 6 of the bloging principles. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Naming conventions by aporem.net &#187; Why I wouldn&#8217;t name my apps like Linux</title>
		<link>http://www.aporem.net/freebsd/naming-conventions/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>aporem.net &#187; Why I wouldn&#8217;t name my apps like Linux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aporem.net/?p=27#comment-5</guid>
		<description>[...] In my last post I laid out the disadvantages of the BSD naming convention of the developement branches. But if that&#8217;s too complicated for the public, how should one count the software releases and the bugfixes? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In my last post I laid out the disadvantages of the BSD naming convention of the developement branches. But if that&#8217;s too complicated for the public, how should one count the software releases and the bugfixes? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Connecting more than one computer to the USV (I) by aporem.net &#187; Connecting more than one computer to the USV (III)</title>
		<link>http://www.aporem.net/freebsd/connecting-more-than-one-computer-to-the-usv-i/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>aporem.net &#187; Connecting more than one computer to the USV (III)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 07:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aporem.net/?p=22#comment-4</guid>
		<description>[...] This is a sort of errata post for Connecting more than one computer to the USV (I), the first part of this series: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is a sort of errata post for Connecting more than one computer to the USV (I), the first part of this series: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Getting power from batteries by aporem.net &#187; The apcupsd single workstation configuration</title>
		<link>http://www.aporem.net/freebsd/getting-power-from-batteries/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>aporem.net &#187; The apcupsd single workstation configuration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aporem.net/?p=20#comment-3</guid>
		<description>[...] In the last post I&#8217;ve laid out the potential benefit of using an UPS along with a properly configured software. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the last post I&#8217;ve laid out the potential benefit of using an UPS along with a properly configured software. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
